Published views put 2030 between £49 and £80 a megawatt hour in today’s money. On the forward curve, summer 2028 trades at £68 and the winter after it at £75.
Power has averaged £102 a megawatt hour so far in 2026, every half hour to September, against £76 across 2024 in today’s money. Vitreous has no long term price of its own yet. Until it does, this page carries every public long term view on one money basis, with the outturn and the forward curve on the same axis, so a reader can see who was right.
Table view of this chart, with sources
| Published view | Vintage | Basis as stated | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2050 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DESNZ EEP reference | Feb 2026 | real 2024 | 81 | 68 | 64 | 63 | 68 | 83 | 115 |
| DESNZ EEP low fuel prices | Feb 2026 | real 2024 | 62 | 53 | 49 | 49 | 54 | 70 | 102 |
| DESNZ EEP high fuel prices | Feb 2026 | real 2024 | 112 | 93 | 84 | 80 | 82 | 95 | 112 |
| DESNZ EEP reference, previous edition | Dec 2024 | real 2023 | 74 | 67 | 64 | 49 | 63 | 76 | 85 |
| LCP Delta, accelerated build | Jun 2026 | real 2025, read from chart | 98 | 72 | 80 | 73 | 72 | ||
| Cornwall Insight benchmark curve, not drawn | Apr 2024 | not stated, fiscal years, as printed | 82 | 83 | 79 | 72 |
£ per MWh in 2026 money, converted with the OBR GDP deflator DESNZ publishes with its fuel price assumptions. DESNZ figures are policy conditioned projections; the LCP Delta line is one named scenario. Cornwall Insight is kept here and not drawn, because its money basis is not stated and its years are fiscal years, so it cannot be put on the same footing. Aurora Energy Research publishes only a change, minus £19/MWh (20%) from 2024 to 2028, 17 June 2024, so it cannot be drawn.
The forward curve, contract by contract
| Season contract | Delivery from | Delivery to | Settled £/MWh, nominal | In 2026 money | Settlement date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winter 2026 | 1 Oct 2026 | 31 Mar 2027 | 158.61 | 156 | 9 Sep 2026 |
| Summer 2027 | 1 Apr 2027 | 30 Sep 2027 | 103.92 | 102 | 9 Sep 2026 |
| Winter 2027 | 1 Oct 2027 | 31 Mar 2028 | 105.47 | 101 | 9 Sep 2026 |
| Summer 2028 | 1 Apr 2028 | 30 Sep 2028 | 70.48 | 68 | 9 Sep 2026 |
| Winter 2028 | 1 Oct 2028 | 31 Mar 2029 | 79.49 | 75 | 9 Sep 2026 |
ICE GB baseload season contracts as reported by Catalyst Commercial, every one from the same settlement day. A forward price is what the season traded at on that day, not a forecast of the spot price; on the chart each season sits at the middle of its delivery period. Quoted with attribution as the publisher permits; not a price feed.
If every battery project at gate 2 connected on its contracted date, Britain would have 21.2 GW by the end of 2030. NESO’s ten year path has 21.7 GW.
The blue line is the contracted book carried forward, not a delivery forecast: some of it will slip and some projects not yet at gate 2 will build. The 0.5 GW between the two lines is the difference between a register and a pathway, and the two count the fleet on different bases, set out under the chart.
Table view of this chart
| Year | Built, DUKES | Gate 2 book, cumulative | NESO Ten Year Outlook | FES 2025 low | FES 2025 high |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 0.1 | ||||
| 2018 | 0.6 | ||||
| 2019 | 0.9 | ||||
| 2020 | 1.1 | ||||
| 2021 | 1.5 | ||||
| 2022 | 2.3 | ||||
| 2023 | 3.8 | ||||
| 2024 | 5.2 | 6.6 | 6.6 | ||
| 2025 | 7.5 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 12.5 | |
| 2026 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 9.7 | 15.8 | |
| 2027 | 16.2 | 13.1 | 11.2 | 18.9 | |
| 2028 | 18.9 | 16.2 | 14.0 | 21.4 | |
| 2029 | 21.1 | 19.0 | 15.9 | 22.6 | |
| 2030 | 21.2 | 21.7 | 19.6 | 24.1 | |
| 2031 | 23.6 | 20.0 | 26.0 | ||
| 2032 | 26.0 | 20.4 | 27.1 | ||
| 2033 | 27.8 | 20.7 | 28.4 | ||
| 2034 | 29.3 | 21.8 | 29.4 | ||
| 2035 | 30.8 | 22.1 | 30.4 | ||
| 2036 | 31.3 | 23.0 | 31.0 |
Gigawatts. NESO figures exclude domestic and micro batteries.
Forecasters put a one hour battery at £60 a kilowatt this year and a two hour battery at £82. The three published lines paid £46 and £61. The rest is wholesale trading, which nobody publishes.
The curve is the blend of two forecasters, not named, that Gresham House Energy Storage Fund uses to value its 1,072 MW, printed in its 2025 annual report. It sits one step downstream of the price chart above: a battery model, how often it cycles, which services it sells and what spread it captures, lies between the two, and that model is theirs, not ours. The gap between the curve and the measured floor is the wholesale trading that no public file records, about £14 a kilowatt at one hour and £24 at two. The same owner reports 40% of its income from trading, which is the same size, and its own 2025 result, £69 a kilowatt on a fleet averaging 1.6 hours, sits on the curve. The same forecasters cut this curve by 14% to 21% at 2030 between the 2024 and 2025 vintages, and the owner says curve cuts have taken 66p a share off its value since December 2022. The chart does not state its money basis. If it is nominal at the 2.5% inflation the owner values with, the one hour line is flat in real terms and the two hour line rises about 5% to 2033 and then holds.
Table view of this chart, with sources
| Published view | Vintage | Basis as stated | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2049 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRID valuation blend, half an hour | Q4 2025 | not stated on the chart; GRID values its fleet with RPI at 2.5% | 40 | 44 | 42 | 44 | 45 | 43 | 43 |
| GRID valuation blend, one hour | Q4 2025 | not stated on the chart; GRID values its fleet with RPI at 2.5% | 60 | 60 | 61 | 66 | 69 | 69 | 71 |
| GRID valuation blend, 1.5 hours | Q4 2025 | not stated on the chart; GRID values its fleet with RPI at 2.5% | 71 | 74 | 77 | 83 | 88 | 89 | 92 |
| GRID valuation blend, two hours | Q4 2025 | not stated on the chart; GRID values its fleet with RPI at 2.5% | 82 | 86 | 89 | 95 | 103 | 103 | 107 |
| GRID valuation blend, half an hour | Q4 2024, rebased | rebased by GRID to sit beside the Q4 2025 blend; basis otherwise not stated | 48 | 45 | 48 | 56 | 58 | 54 | 52 |
| GRID valuation blend, one hour | Q4 2024, rebased | rebased by GRID to sit beside the Q4 2025 blend; basis otherwise not stated | 67 | 66 | 67 | 80 | 86 | 93 | 92 |
| GRID valuation blend, 1.5 hours | Q4 2024, rebased | rebased by GRID to sit beside the Q4 2025 blend; basis otherwise not stated | 82 | 81 | 84 | 99 | 105 | 114 | 113 |
| GRID valuation blend, two hours | Q4 2024, rebased | rebased by GRID to sit beside the Q4 2025 blend; basis otherwise not stated | 92 | 94 | 98 | 110 | 118 | 127 | 125 |
| Measured floor, nearer one hour, 50 batteries, 1,825 MW | year to 27 Sep 2026 | nominal, three published lines, no wholesale | 46 | ||||||
| Measured floor, nearer two hours, 67 batteries, 2,728 MW | year to 27 Sep 2026 | nominal, three published lines, no wholesale | 61 |
£ per kilowatt a year, every revenue line together, as published and not converted, because the money basis is not stated. The measured floor is the Vitreous measured index: what the same panel of batteries was actually paid on the balancing mechanism, in the response and reserve auctions and by the capacity market, annualised, with wholesale trading left out because nobody publishes it. GRID valuation blend, Q4 2025: A blend of two forecasters GRID does not name, used to value its 1,072 MW operating fleet at 31 December 2025. Sampled from the PDF vector paths at each year label, rounded to £100. The printed legend labels both line sets Q4 2024; the title and the text say the solid lines are the blend used in the current valuation and the dashed lines the previous blend rebased. GRID valuation blend, Q4 2024, rebased: The same two forecasters a year earlier. Sampled from the PDF vector paths at each year label, rounded to £100.
Why there is no Vitreous line on the chart yet
A ten year price needs a model of the whole system: every gas plant’s cost, the wind and solar output hour by hour, the demand, the cables to the continent, the carbon price. The engine exists and passes its tests. The national inputs do not exist yet, there is no carbon price series in the building at all, and the government’s central gas assumption is already less than half of this month’s price. Until a historical year can be reproduced to a stated error, no Vitreous number goes on this page. What can go here is the published range, kept on one money basis and checked against the outturn as the years arrive, and the things the price depends on.
Wind was paid 91% of the average price in 2024 and gas 117%, because they generate at different hours
Each technology’s capture price is the average price in the hours it was generating, weighted by how much it generated, shown here as a share of the year’s average price. Wind sold below the average in every year and gas above it. This is the shape of the market a battery lives in, not the spread a battery can capture: what a battery actually earns depends on when it charges and discharges, its usable energy, its losses and how far ahead it can see, and that arithmetic is done from real days on the UK Live page.
Table view of this chart
| Year | Wind | Solar | Nuclear | Gas | Average price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 177 | 205 | 203 | 226 | 205 |
| 2023 | 90 | 85 | 93 | 106 | 94 |
| 2024 | 66 | 65 | 72 | 85 | 73 |
£ per MWh, nominal.
Gas is at £65 a megawatt hour in September, above the government’s high case for 2026. The market expects it back near £28 by 2028.
Gas sets the British power price in most evening hours and will for years yet. The government’s three assumptions, published in February, put 2026 at £30 central and £51 high. Across 2026 so far the monthly average has been £42, between the central and high cases, so the year is not yet outside the government’s range; this month is. The forward curve prices this winter as a crisis and the winter of 2028 as ordinary, which is roughly where the government’s central line sits.
Table view of this chart
| Year | DESNZ low | DESNZ central | DESNZ high |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28 | 34 | 43 |
| 2026 | 19 | 30 | 51 |
| 2027 | 16 | 26 | 44 |
| 2028 | 15 | 26 | 44 |
| 2029 | 15 | 26 | 43 |
| 2030 | 15 | 25 | 43 |
| 2031 | 15 | 25 | 43 |
| 2032 | 14 | 25 | 42 |
| 2033 | 14 | 25 | 42 |
| 2034 | 14 | 25 | 41 |
| 2035 | 13 | 25 | 41 |
| 2036 | 13 | 24 | 40 |
| 2037 | 13 | 24 | 40 |
| 2038 | 12 | 24 | 39 |
| 2039 | 12 | 24 | 39 |
| 2040 | 11 | 24 | 39 |
£ per MWh in 2026 money. Forward curve settled on 9 September 2026, deflated: Winter 2026 £66, Summer 2027 £44, Winter 2027 £41, Summer 2028 £26, Winter 2028 £28.
What is on this page and what is not
On it: every public long term view of the price on one money basis, the outturn and the forward curve beside them, the fleet as built, the contracted book by year, NESO’s published pathways, every published forecast of what a battery earns with the measured floor beside it, the capture prices of the past three years, and the government’s gas assumptions against the gas market. Every number traces to a published file or to the Vitreous register, and the table under each chart carries the values and the sources.
Not on it: a Vitreous price forecast, a Vitreous battery revenue forecast, or a probability that any project builds. The delivery risk score on the Atlas reads consent stage against years to the contracted date and is not a probability.
Published views: the latest vintage from each publisher is drawn and every vintage stays in the table. When a publisher issues a new view the old line moves to the table and the new one takes its place. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Supported by National Energy SO Open Data.