Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency

Gerrards Cross BESS

20 MW, about 20 MWh (1 hour, from the capacity market de-rating class) in Oxfordshire, Surrey and Sussex. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 27 September 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power20 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration1 hour capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneOxfordshire, Surrey and Sussex
PostcodeSL9 7BQ
Balancing mechanism unitE_GRCRB-1

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded byFIELD GERRARDS CROSS LTDconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned byFIELD GERRARDS CROSS LTD
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder
UltimatelyField (Virmati Energy Ltd) confirmed source

How we know. The SPVs carry Field's name; Field is the trading name of Virmati Energy Ltd, and DIF Capital Partners' £200m investment of July 2023 funds the fleet.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 27 September 2026
Balancing mechanism£225k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£465k
Capacity market£48k
Three lines together£738k

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 15,807 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 16 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 346 days to 12 September 2026, 33 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out6,643 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in8,082 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge332 over 346 days, 350 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency82%, plausible: losses plus a standing load that is material against a modest throughput
Balancing offers accepted3,278 MWh
Balancing bids accepted2,726 MWh
Position outside balancing, export6,818 MWh
Position outside balancing, import8,809 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−1,550 MWh 1,546 out, 3,096 in
Traded position, net−441 MWh 6,946 out, 7,387 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£741k
Traded position at the market index, bought£633k
Traded position, net, at the index£108k
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£162k −£144k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£148k £7.78/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £93.43. What it sent out was worth £106.74 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.14 times the average. What it took in was worth £85.75, 0.92 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 2,726 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £73.74 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £105.66 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £31.92 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero217 MWh−£14.71£3k received
£0 to £25159 MWh£12.44£2k
£25 to £50193 MWh£38.39£7k
£50 to £75555 MWh£65.13£36k
£75 to £100935 MWh£86.20£81k
above £100666 MWh£117.18£78k

On 217 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £14.71 a megawatt hour to take energy, £3k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 3,278 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £122.89 against an index of £88.49.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr58th percentile98 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group41st percentile70 units
Balancing income1.0 hour duration cohort87th percentile24 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr71st percentile229 units
Energy sent outhours at full power61st percentile96 units
Energy taken inhours at full power38th percentile96 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Willoughby201h£64.7/kW/yr
Gerrards Cross BESSthis battery201h£37.0/kW/yr
Feeder Road201.5h£35.8/kW/yr
Ernesettle191h£18.5/kW/yr
Pulse Clean (HAB12-FFR)211h£17.4/kW/yr
Pulse Clean (HAB13-FFR)211h£12.8/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.