Swindon
19 MW, about 38 MWh (2 hours, from the capacity market de-rating class) in Cotswold. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 22 September 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.
What it is
| Registered power | 19 MW response and reserve auction registration |
| Storage duration | 2.0 hours capacity market de-rating class |
| Charging zone | Cotswold |
| Connection site | Swindon |
| Postcode | SN3 4TD |
| Balancing mechanism unit | E_SWDNB-1 a balancing mechanism unit this site does not yet read; its balancing actions are not yet counted on this site |
| Reserve auction codes | SWDN-1 until 5 August 2026; SWDNB-1 from 16 September 2026 the same battery under a new code, usually a new company trading it; its money here is both codes together |
Who owns it and who trades it
| Traded by | CONRAD ENERGY (TRADING) LIMITEDruns several sitesauction results, unchecked |
| Owned by | CONRAD (SWINDON) LIMITED |
| Owner established from | capacity market registered holder |
| Ultimately | Conrad Energy confirmed source |
How we know. The control filing on Conrad (Blackpool) Limited runs to Conrad (Glyme) Limited and, before July 2023, Conrad Energy (Holdings) II Limited. The sibling companies share the same Abingdon registered office.
Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. This unit is registered only in the response and reserve auctions, so the seller is the participant NESO's auction results name, and Elexon's register carries no entry to check it against. How we tell them apart
What it earned
| Line | 364 days to 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Balancing mechanism | not yet counted |
| Response and reserve auctions auction implied | £726k |
| Capacity market | £97k |
| Three lines together | £823k |
Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is at the price the agreement cleared at, before inflation uprating, so it is a floor. Method
Outside the balancing mechanism, estimated from metered peers
Elexon publishes no metered output for this battery. Its balancing registration, E_SWDNB-1, is a balancing mechanism unit this site does not yet read, and this site reads no meter for it, so nothing can be derived for it. What can be said is what its peers did: 40 units of about 2 hours in England and Wales, metered, earned between £6.34 and £38.75 per kilowatt a year with the balancing legs and the position outside the balancing mechanism together, £29.05 at the median. Applied to this unit's 19 MW that is £552k, in a range of £120k to £736k. An estimate from other batteries, never this one's figure. Method
Where it stands
| All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr | 69th percentile199 units |
Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.
The nearest comparables
The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.
| Battery | MW | Hours | Measured, per kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oldham BESS | 20 | 2h | £70.0/kW/yr |
| Carnegie Road 1 | 20 | 2h | £49.3/kW/yr |
| Farnham BESS | 20 | 2h | £43.7/kW/yr |
| Swindonthis battery | 19 | 2h | £43.5/kW/yr |
| Winchester (WNCHB-1) | 19 | 2h | £37.9/kW/yr |
| Hawkers Hill Battery | 20 | 2h | £36.1/kW/yr |
See it on the map
Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.