Fordtown
46 MW, about 46 MWh (1 hour, from the capacity market de-rating class) in North Scotland. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 22 September 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.
What it is
| Registered power | 46 MW response and reserve auction registration |
| Storage duration | 1.0 hours capacity market de-rating class |
| Charging zone | North Scotland |
| Connection site | Aberdeenshire |
| Postcode | AB51 0XJ |
| Balancing mechanism unit | V__PHABI004 a virtual unit registered by the company that trades it; its balancing actions are not yet counted on this site |
Who owns it and who trades it
| Traded by | HABITAT ENERGY LIMITEDruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register |
| Owned by | SUSI EELPOWER FORDTOWN LIMITED |
| Owner established from | capacity market registered holder |
| Ultimately | SUSI Partners and Eelpower joint venture confirmed source |
How we know. The SPV name carries the joint venture; EDF and SUSI releases describe the fleet.
Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart
What it earned
| Line | 364 days to 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Balancing mechanism | not yet counted |
| Response and reserve auctions auction implied | £3.1m |
| Capacity market | £158k |
| Three lines together | £3.3m |
Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is at the price the agreement cleared at, before inflation uprating, so it is a floor. Method
Outside the balancing mechanism
Elexon publishes no metered output for this battery. Its balancing registration, V__PHABI004, is a virtual unit registered by the company that trades it, and this site reads no meter for it, so nothing outside the balancing mechanism can be derived for it. We give it no estimate either. It was paid £67.76 per kilowatt a year in the response and reserve auctions, which means it spends most of its time held in those services rather than trading. The 4 batteries with a published meter that were paid £60 or more per kilowatt a year in the auctions made between −£15.12 and £0.21 per kilowatt a year outside them, balancing included: they buy power only to cover their losses while they are held. Borrowing a figure from batteries that trade would overstate this one. Method
Where it stands
| All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr | 84th percentile199 units |
Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.
The nearest comparables
The five nearest in size in Scotland, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.
| Battery | MW | Hours | Measured, per kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braco | 9 | 1.5h | £120.2/kW/yr |
| Orchardbank | 9 | 1.5h | £84.9/kW/yr |
| Fordtownthis battery | 46 | 1h | £71.2/kW/yr |
| Whitelee 1 Battery | 50 | 1h | £32.6/kW/yr |
| Gridreserve | 28 | 1h | £11.8/kW/yr |
See it on the map
Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.