Brentwood
49 MW in Essex and Kent. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 11 November 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.
What it is
| Registered power | 49 MW balancing mechanism registration |
| Charging zone | Essex and Kent |
| Connection site | Brentwood |
| Postcode | CM13 1UN |
| Balancing mechanism unit | E_BRETB-1 |
Who owns it and who trades it
| Traded by | EDF Energy Customers Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register |
| Owned by | not published anywhere we can read |
| Ultimately | Voltwise Power (Sandbrook Capital) confirmed source |
How we know. Voltwise's own project list carries Brook Farm and Brentwood; acquired with the SMS battery business, announced 23 June 2025.
Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart
What it earned
| Line | 364 days to 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Balancing mechanism | £0 |
| Response and reserve auctions auction implied | £126k |
| Capacity market | no agreement we can attach |
| Three lines together | £126k |
Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method
Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter
Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 1,173 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 3 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 125 days to 17 March 2026. Method and caveats
| Line | MWh or £ |
|---|---|
| Metered export, what crossed the meter out | 5,070 MWh |
| Metered import, what crossed the meter in | 6,486 MWh |
| Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge | · |
| Apparent meter to meter efficiency | 78%, plausible: losses plus a standing load that is material against a modest throughput |
| Balancing offers accepted | 0 MWh |
| Balancing bids accepted | 0 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, export | 5,070 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, import | 6,486 MWh |
| Of which expected response delivery, net | 1 MWh 175 out, 174 in |
| Traded position, net | −1,418 MWh 5,004 out, 6,422 in |
| Traded position at the market index, sold | £469k |
| Traded position at the market index, bought | £488k |
| Traded position, net, at the index | −£18k |
| Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price | −£840 £126 at the index |
| Balancing and outside balancing together | −£19k £-1.15/kW/yr |
This battery connects to a distribution network. For such a unit the volumes Elexon publishes are settlement volumes: the site's own meter multiplied by the network operator's line loss factor for that half hour. The factor is usually within a few per cent of one, so the megawatt hours, cycles and efficiency above can sit a little above or below what crossed the site's meter. The money is settled on the same adjusted volumes. Method and caveats
When it moved, against when power was dear
Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £85.13. What it sent out was worth £93.80 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.10 times the average. What it took in was worth £75.97, 0.89 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.
Checks this unit did not pass cleanly. Published anyway, because a flagged figure with its flag is more use than a blank.
- only 125 of 364 days metered
The nearest comparables
The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. How long this battery can run for is not published, so duration is not used to choose them. Same market, same rules, same weather.
| Battery | MW | Hours | Measured, per kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Melksham East | 49 | 2h | £143.2/kW/yr |
| Roosecote BESS | 49 | not known | £62.3/kW/yr |
| SSE Salisbury | 49 | 2h | £57.7/kW/yr |
| Tollgate Energy Storage | 49 | 1h | £41.1/kW/yr |
| Cowley | 49 | 1.5h | £31.2/kW/yr |
| Brentwoodthis battery | 49 | not known | £2.6/kW/yr |
See it on the map
Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.
Need every battery at once? The register is not offered for automated download, and bulk access is by request at hello@vitreouslabs.com.