Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Harestanes

52 MW in Solway and Cheviot. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 11 November 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power52 MW balancing mechanism registration
Charging zoneSolway and Cheviot
Connection siteHarestanes
PostcodeDG11 1TU
Balancing mechanism unitT_HRSTB-1

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded bySP Renewables (UK) Limitedconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned bynot published anywhere we can read
UltimatelyScottishPower Renewables (Iberdrola) confirmed source

How we know. The register names no owner. The lead party is SP Renewables (UK) Limited and Gary confirmed on 9 September 2026 that ScottishPower Renewables owns Harestanes.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 11 November 2026
Balancing mechanism−£5k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£912k
Capacity marketno agreement we can attach
Three lines together£908k

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 8,076 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 5 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 358 days to 5 November 2026, 42 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out3,380 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in5,713 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge·
Apparent meter to meter efficiency59%, not ordinary battery losses alone
Balancing offers accepted235 MWh
Balancing bids accepted793 MWh
Position outside balancing, export3,359 MWh
Position outside balancing, import5,134 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−201 MWh 746 out, 947 in
Traded position, net−1,575 MWh 2,941 out, 4,516 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£461k
Traded position at the market index, bought£398k
Traded position, net, at the index£63k
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£30k −£19k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£29k £0.57/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £104.66. What it sent out was worth £156.68 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.50 times the average. What it took in was worth £88.19, 0.84 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 793 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £42.99 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £88.18 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £45.19 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero97 MWh−£16.35£2k received
£0 to £25190 MWh£5.27£1k
£25 to £50224 MWh£44.27£10k
£50 to £75170 MWh£60.16£10k
£75 to £10024 MWh£84.41£2k
above £10088 MWh£141.84£12k

On 97 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £16.35 a megawatt hour to take energy, £2k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 235 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £131.18 against an index of £98.28.

Checks this unit did not pass cleanly. Published anyway, because a flagged figure with its flag is more use than a blank.

  • returns only 59% of what it takes in, with 3,379 MWh exported all year, about 65 full power hours: a unit that barely cycles, where its own standing consumption and losses dominate a small throughput

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr2nd percentile103 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group3rd percentile75 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr30th percentile234 units
Energy sent outhours at full power1st percentile101 units
Energy taken inhours at full power2nd percentile101 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. How long this battery can run for is not published, so duration is not used to choose them. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Larks Green Battery Storage521h£48.4/kW/yr
Newton wood BESS521h£40.7/kW/yr
Burwell 1521h£39.3/kW/yr
Brook Farm BESS521h£37.1/kW/yr
Brentwood BESS521h£31.9/kW/yr
Harestanesthis battery52not known£17.5/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.

Need every battery at once? The register is not offered for automated download, and bulk access is by request at hello@vitreouslabs.com.