Hawthorn Pit BESS
49.9 MW, about 100 MWh (2 hours, published by Harmony Energy Income Trust) in North East England. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 11 November 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.
What it is
| Power | 49.9 MW published by its owner; Elexon registers 60 MW |
| Storage duration | 2 hours published by Harmony Energy Income Trust |
| Charging zone | North East England |
| Balancing mechanism unit | 2__FBPGM002 |
The power on this page comes from the owner. Harmony Energy Income Trust, which owns the battery, told the London Stock Exchange on 12 September 2024 that it had been energised at 49.9 MW and 99.8 MWh, a two hour system. Solar Power Portal reported the announcement the same day. Elexon registers the unit at 60 MW. The meter agrees with the owner: across 17,472 half hours from 8 October 2025 to 6 October 2026 it never averaged more than 51.0 MW sending power out or 52.6 MW taking it in. Every per kilowatt figure on this site is worked from 49.9 MW. Read the announcement.
Where the duration comes from. Harmony Energy Income Trust announced Hawthorn Pit on 12 September 2024 as 49.9 MW and 99.8 MWh, a two hour system (London Stock Exchange announcement 16661500). Every megawatt hour figure on this site for this battery is worked from 2 hours.
Who owns it and who trades it
| Traded by | BP Gas Marketing Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register |
| Owned by | HEIT HP LIMITED |
| Owner established from | capacity market registered holder |
| Ultimately | Harmony Energy Income Trust (assets under Foresight Group) probable source |
How we know. The HEIT SPV naming; the trust sold its assets to Foresight.
Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart
What it is built from
| Battery system | Envision Energy, two hour liquid cooled |
| Entered operation | 2024-09 (energisation announced 12 September 2024) |
| Planning reference | the NatPower neighbour is DM/25/02255/FPA; this site's own reference not yet found |
From published documents, not from any register: supplier and contractor project pages, owner announcements and the trade press. Confidence: confirmed. Checked 2026-08-30. source 1 · source 2. Fields not shown are not published anywhere we have found, and we do not guess them.
What it earned
| Line | 364 days to 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Balancing mechanism | −£1.1m |
| Response and reserve auctions auction implied | £1.1m |
| Capacity market | £319k |
| Three lines together | £399k |
Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method
Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter
Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 6,603 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 8 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 358 days to 5 November 2026, 42 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats
| Line | MWh or £ |
|---|---|
| Metered export, what crossed the meter out | 43,661 MWh |
| Metered import, what crossed the meter in | 50,923 MWh |
| Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge | 438 over 358 days, 446 a year at that rate |
| Apparent meter to meter efficiency | 86%, an ordinary battery: round trip losses alone |
| Balancing offers accepted | 16,797 MWh |
| Balancing bids accepted | 37,030 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, export | 55,180 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, import | 42,209 MWh |
| Of which expected response delivery, net | −3,822 MWh 4,386 out, 8,208 in |
| Traded position, net | 16,793 MWh 54,630 out, 37,837 in |
| Traded position at the market index, sold | £6.6m |
| Traded position at the market index, bought | £3.3m |
| Traded position, net, at the index | £3.3m |
| Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price | −£463k −£424k at the index |
| Balancing and outside balancing together | £1.9m £38.67/kW/yr |
This battery connects to a distribution network. For such a unit the volumes Elexon publishes are settlement volumes: the site's own meter multiplied by the network operator's line loss factor for that half hour. The factor is usually within a few per cent of one, so the megawatt hours, cycles and efficiency above can sit a little above or below what crossed the site's meter. The money is settled on the same adjusted volumes. Method and caveats
When it moved, against when power was dear
Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £104.66. What it sent out was worth £121.14 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.16 times the average. What it took in was worth £88.34, 0.84 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.
What it paid to buy energy back
When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 37,030 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £83.02 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £115.58 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £32.56 a megawatt hour below the going price.
| Price it paid | Volume | Average | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|
| below zero | 2,065 MWh | −£21.44 | £44k received |
| £0 to £25 | 2,327 MWh | £12.24 | £28k |
| £25 to £50 | 2,931 MWh | £38.42 | £113k |
| £50 to £75 | 6,999 MWh | £64.08 | £448k |
| £75 to £100 | 10,645 MWh | £86.54 | £921k |
| above £100 | 12,063 MWh | £133.29 | £1.6m |
On 2,065 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £21.44 a megawatt hour to take energy, £44k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.
The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 16,797 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £128.23 against an index of £98.70.
Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.
Where it stands
| Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr | 66th percentile103 units | |
| Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group | 53rd percentile75 units | |
| Balancing income2.0 hour duration cohort | 56th percentile63 units | |
| All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr | 81st percentile234 units | |
| Energy sent outhours at full power | 68th percentile101 units | |
| Energy taken inhours at full power | 88th percentile101 units |
Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.
The nearest comparables
The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.
| Battery | MW | Hours | Measured, per kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pillswood 2 Battery Storage | 50 | 1.5h | £48.3/kW/yr |
| Pillswood 1 Battery Storage | 50 | 1.5h | £46.8/kW/yr |
| Richborough Energy Park 2 | 50 | 2h | £37.1/kW/yr |
| Bredbury BESS | 50 | 2h | £31.4/kW/yr |
| Skelmersdale Battery | 50 | 2h | £21.8/kW/yr |
| Hawthorn Pit BESSthis battery | 50 | 2h | £8.0/kW/yr |
In its distribution register
The distribution register of Northern Powergrid lists this site as Hawthorn Pit BESS, 50 MW, connected on 8 April 2024. Matched on a site word in common, 1 km apart.
See it on the Development Atlas
From each operator’s embedded capacity register, read every Monday. How the registers are linked to the units that trade.
See it on the map
Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.
Need every battery at once? The register is not offered for automated download, and bulk access is by request at hello@vitreouslabs.com.