Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Wolverhampton West BESS

56 MW, about 112 MWh (2 hours, from the capacity market de-rating class) in Mid Wales and The Midlands. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 11 November 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power56 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration2 hours capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneMid Wales and The Midlands
Connection siteSouth Staffordshire
PostcodeWV4 4XX
Balancing mechanism unitE_WOLVB-1
Reserve auction codesWOLV-1 until 19 March 2026; WOLVB-1 from 21 March 2026 the same battery under a new code, usually a new company trading it; its money here is both codes together

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded byEDF Energy Customers Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned byCARE POWER (WOLVERHAMPTON) LIMITED
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder
UltimatelyVoltwise Power (Sandbrook Capital) confirmed source

How we know. Companies House: Care Power (Barnsley) is controlled by Care Assets Ltd, whose controller changed from SMS Energy Services to Voltwise UK BESS Opco on 19 May 2025; the sibling SPVs share the same parent.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 11 November 2026
Balancing mechanism£177k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£283k
Capacity market£238k
Three lines together£698k

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 6,942 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 14 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 358 days to 5 November 2026, 42 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out29,999 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in34,646 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge268 over 358 days, 273 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency87%, an ordinary battery: round trip losses alone
Balancing offers accepted10,519 MWh
Balancing bids accepted15,139 MWh
Position outside balancing, export30,947 MWh
Position outside balancing, import30,974 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−5,005 MWh 1,759 out, 6,764 in
Traded position, net4,979 MWh 32,415 out, 27,436 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£4.3m
Traded position at the market index, bought£2.4m
Traded position, net, at the index£1.8m
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£623k −£600k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£1.4m £26.14/kW/yr

This battery connects to a distribution network. For such a unit the volumes Elexon publishes are settlement volumes: the site's own meter multiplied by the network operator's line loss factor for that half hour. The factor is usually within a few per cent of one, so the megawatt hours, cycles and efficiency above can sit a little above or below what crossed the site's meter. The money is settled on the same adjusted volumes. Method and caveats

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £104.66. What it sent out was worth £131.19 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.25 times the average. What it took in was worth £88.72, 0.85 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 15,139 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £85.36 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £114.91 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £29.55 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero1,174 MWh−£19.30£23k received
£0 to £25919 MWh£13.34£12k
£25 to £501,044 MWh£37.87£40k
£50 to £751,608 MWh£66.64£107k
£75 to £1004,407 MWh£87.01£383k
above £1005,988 MWh£129.04£773k

On 1,174 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £19.30 a megawatt hour to take energy, £23k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 10,519 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £145.75 against an index of £107.33.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr67th percentile103 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group54th percentile75 units
Balancing income2.0 hour duration cohort58th percentile63 units
Balancing incomebatteries sold by EDF Energy Customers Limited83rd percentile13 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr51st percentile234 units
Energy sent outhours at full power63rd percentile101 units
Energy taken inhours at full power53rd percentile101 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Pivot Power Coventry502h£54.8/kW/yr
Pivot Power Bustleholme522h£46.5/kW/yr
Sizing John572.5h£33.7/kW/yr
Bulphan Fen Warley Green BESS572h£23.0/kW/yr
Native River572h£17.8/kW/yr
Wolverhampton West BESSthis battery562h£12.5/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.

Need every battery at once? The register is not offered for automated download, and bulk access is by request at hello@vitreouslabs.com.