Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Whitelee 1 Battery

50 MW, about 50 MWh (1 hour, from the capacity market de-rating class) in South West Scotland. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 11 November 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power50 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration1 hour capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneSouth West Scotland
Connection siteWhitelee wind farm
PostcodeG75 0QN
Balancing mechanism unitT_WHLWB-1

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded bySP Renewables (UK) Limitedconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned bySCOTTISHPOWER RENEWABLES (UK) LIMITED
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder
UltimatelyScottishPower Renewables (Iberdrola) confirmed source

How we know. SPR's own BESS page.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it is built from

Battery systemIngeteam (system integration), liquid cooled lithium ion
CellsCATL
Engineering and constructionThink Energy (balance of plant); Schneider Electric (switchgear)
Entered operation2022-10

From published documents, not from any register: supplier and contractor project pages, owner announcements and the trade press. Confidence: confirmed. Checked 2026-08-31. source 1 · source 2. Fields not shown are not published anywhere we have found, and we do not guess them.

What it earned

Line364 days to 11 November 2026
Balancing mechanism−£51k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£1.6m
Capacity market£208k
Three lines together£1.8m

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 16,006 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 16 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 358 days to 5 November 2026, 42 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out7,398 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in10,344 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge147 over 358 days, 150 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency72%, worth investigating: more than ordinary losses
Balancing offers accepted404 MWh
Balancing bids accepted1,902 MWh
Position outside balancing, export7,590 MWh
Position outside balancing, import9,039 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−649 MWh 1,786 out, 2,435 in
Traded position, net−800 MWh 6,696 out, 7,496 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£936k
Traded position at the market index, bought£628k
Traded position, net, at the index£308k
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£71k −£55k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£187k £3.81/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £104.66. What it sent out was worth £139.87 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.34 times the average. What it took in was worth £83.80, 0.80 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 1,902 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £53.08 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £89.90 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £36.82 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero176 MWh−£22.60£4k received
£0 to £25227 MWh£5.24£1k
£25 to £50275 MWh£40.73£11k
£50 to £75709 MWh£61.99£44k
£75 to £100409 MWh£83.99£34k
above £100105 MWh£134.99£14k

On 176 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £22.60 a megawatt hour to take energy, £4k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 404 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £126.57 against an index of £105.35.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr3rd percentile103 units
Balancing incomeScotland peer group1st percentile28 units
Balancing income1.0 hour duration cohort1st percentile29 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr51st percentile234 units
Energy sent outhours at full power2nd percentile101 units
Energy taken inhours at full power5th percentile101 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in Scotland, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Camilla491.5h£99.7/kW/yr
Fordtown460.5h£70.1/kW/yr
Dunsinane441h£51.2/kW/yr
Byers Brae (EDF01N)281h£35.2/kW/yr
Whitelee 1 Batterythis battery501h£35.0/kW/yr
Ferrymuir491h£18.1/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.

Need every battery at once? The register is not offered for automated download, and bulk access is by request at hello@vitreouslabs.com.