Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency

Camilla

49 MW, about 49 MWh (1 hour, from the capacity market de-rating class) in Stirlingshire and Fife. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 27 September 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power49 MW response and reserve auction registration
Storage duration1 hour capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneStirlingshire and Fife
Connection siteFife
PostcodeKY2 5XW
Balancing mechanism unitV__NHABI005 a virtual unit registered by the company that trades it; its balancing actions are not yet counted on this site

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded byHABITAT ENERGY LIMITEDruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned byNEXTPOWER EELPOWER CAMILLA LIMITED
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 27 September 2026
Balancing mechanismnot yet counted
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£4.4m
Capacity market£377k
Three lines together£4.8m

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 3,743 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 6 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 88 days to 12 September 2026, 32 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out4,689 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in5,732 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge95.7 over 88 days, 397 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency82%, plausible: losses plus a standing load that is material against a modest throughput
Balancing offers accepted0 MWh
Balancing bids accepted0 MWh
Position outside balancing, export4,689 MWh
Position outside balancing, import5,732 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net7,226 MWh 7,311 out, 85 in
Traded position, net−8,270 MWh 281 out, 8,551 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£33k
Traded position at the market index, bought£992k
Traded position, net, at the index−£959k
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price£825k £838k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together−£135k £-11.39/kW/yr

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £116.56. What it sent out was worth £117.06 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.00 times the average. What it took in was worth £116.05, 1.00 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

Checks this unit did not pass cleanly. Published anyway, because a flagged figure with its flag is more use than a blank.

  • only 88 of 364 days metered

Where it stands

All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr94th percentile229 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in Scotland, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Camillathis battery491h£97.9/kW/yr
Fordtown461h£71.9/kW/yr
Dunsinane441h£44.8/kW/yr
Whitelee 1 Battery501h£33.9/kW/yr
Ferrymuir491h£29.5/kW/yr
Byers Brae (EDF01N)281h£14.8/kW/yr

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.