Vitreous LabsEnergy transparency
Great Britain · the operating fleet

Carnegie Road 1

20 MW, about 40 MWh (2 hours, from the capacity market de-rating class) in North Midlands and North Wales. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 11 November 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.

What it is

Registered power20 MW balancing mechanism registration
Storage duration2 hours capacity market de-rating class
Charging zoneNorth Midlands and North Wales
Connection siteLiverpool
PostcodeL13 7HY
Balancing mechanism unitE_CRSSB-1

Who owns it and who trades it

Traded byArenko Cleantech Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register
Owned byLISTER BATTERY LTD
Owner established fromcapacity market registered holder
UltimatelyGresham House Energy Storage Fund confirmed source

How we know. The registered office of each company names Gresham House Asset Management, read company by company on 31 August 2026. The address alone would not settle it, because 875 companies sit at 5 New Street Square; the care of line naming the manager is the discriminator.

Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart

What it earned

Line364 days to 11 November 2026
Balancing mechanism£100k
Response and reserve auctions auction implied£567k
Capacity market£456k
Three lines together£1.1m

Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method

Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter

Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 15,658 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 21 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 358 days to 5 November 2026, 42 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats

LineMWh or £
Metered export, what crossed the meter out3,553 MWh
Metered import, what crossed the meter in4,630 MWh
Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge88.8 over 358 days, 90.6 a year at that rate
Apparent meter to meter efficiency77%, worth investigating: more than ordinary losses
Balancing offers accepted2,346 MWh
Balancing bids accepted1,832 MWh
Position outside balancing, export3,110 MWh
Position outside balancing, import4,701 MWh
Of which expected response delivery, net−58 MWh 611 out, 669 in
Traded position, net−1,533 MWh 2,995 out, 4,528 in
Traded position at the market index, sold£371k
Traded position at the market index, bought£406k
Traded position, net, at the index−£35k
Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price−£15k −£10k at the index
Balancing and outside balancing together£58k £2.94/kW/yr

This battery connects to a distribution network. For such a unit the volumes Elexon publishes are settlement volumes: the site's own meter multiplied by the network operator's line loss factor for that half hour. The factor is usually within a few per cent of one, so the megawatt hours, cycles and efficiency above can sit a little above or below what crossed the site's meter. The money is settled on the same adjusted volumes. Method and caveats

When it moved, against when power was dear

Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £104.66. What it sent out was worth £124.00 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.19 times the average. What it took in was worth £89.76, 0.86 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.

What it paid to buy energy back

When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 1,832 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £92.05 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £124.13 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £32.08 a megawatt hour below the going price.

Price it paidVolumeAverageCash
below zero54 MWh−£19.10£1k received
£0 to £2547 MWh£11.98£559
£25 to £5082 MWh£39.45£3k
£50 to £75321 MWh£64.82£21k
£75 to £100625 MWh£87.64£55k
above £100704 MWh£128.27£90k

On 54 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £19.10 a megawatt hour to take energy, £1k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.

The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 2,346 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £117.61 against an index of £88.06.

Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.

Where it stands

Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr34th percentile103 units
Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group28th percentile75 units
Balancing income2.0 hour duration cohort23rd percentile63 units
All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr71st percentile234 units
Energy sent outhours at full power50th percentile101 units
Energy taken inhours at full power18th percentile101 units

Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.

The nearest comparables

The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.

BatteryMWHoursMeasured, per kW
Oldham BESS202h£78.5/kW/yr
Willoughby201.5h£69.9/kW/yr
Carnegie Road 1this battery202h£56.3/kW/yr
Feeder Road201.5h£53.8/kW/yr
Farnham BESS202h£35.0/kW/yr
Hawkers Hill Battery202h£34.1/kW/yr

In its distribution register

The distribution register of SP Energy Networks lists this site as Carnegie Road, 20 MW, connected on 1 January 2018. Matched on a site word in common, 0 km apart.

See it on the Development Atlas

From each operator’s embedded capacity register, read every Monday. How the registers are linked to the units that trade.

See it on the map

Open the operating map here

Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.

Need every battery at once? The register is not offered for automated download, and bulk access is by request at hello@vitreouslabs.com.