Hawkers Hill Battery
20 MW, about 40 MWh (2 hours, from the capacity market de-rating class) in Somerset and Wessex. Everything on this page is read from published data for the 364 days to 27 September 2026, or is labelled as an estimate.
What it is
| Registered power | 20 MW balancing mechanism registration |
| Storage duration | 2 hours capacity market de-rating class |
| Charging zone | Somerset and Wessex |
| Connection site | Hawkers Hill |
| Balancing mechanism unit | E_HAWKB-1 |
Who owns it and who trades it
| Traded by | Tesla Motors Limitedruns several sitesconfirmed, Elexon's register |
| Owned by | HAWKERS HILL ENERGY PARK LIMITED |
| Owner established from | capacity market registered holder |
| Ultimately | TagEnergy confirmed source |
How we know. The control filing gives the company to TagEnergy UK Limited at three quarters or more with the right to appoint directors, since November 2020, and an individual held it before that. The capacity market agrees, holding a site called Hawkers Hill in the TagEnergy name 230 metres away. The registered office is RES's, which reflects who developed and administers it rather than who owns it.
Market registers name the party that sells into the market, which for a battery is usually an optimiser under contract rather than the owner. Elexon's balancing mechanism unit register names the seller here and the name is checked against it on every build. How we tell them apart
What it earned
| Line | 364 days to 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Balancing mechanism | £530k |
| Response and reserve auctions auction implied | £0 |
| Capacity market | £227k |
| Three lines together | £757k |
Balancing is offer revenue and does not net off the cost of the power. The response and reserve figure is the value implied by the published auction results, award quantity times clearing price times the length of the delivery window, and not a settled payment. Capacity market income is the cleared price raised for inflation where the auction set a base period, split by month on EMRS's weights. Method
Outside the balancing mechanism, derived from the meter
Elexon publishes what this unit's meter recorded every half hour. Take away the balancing volumes NESO accepted and what is left is the position the unit ran outside the balancing mechanism: its wholesale trading, its frequency response delivery, and its losses, together. This unit held a frequency response contract in 8,189 of those half hours. The energy the contract asked of it, contracted megawatts times NESO's published delivery curve at the measured grid frequency, is taken out of the position and valued at the imbalance price, because it sits outside the unit's declared position and that is the price Elexon settles it at. What remains is the traded position, valued at the market index. In 8 half hours a contract was held but the grid frequency is not yet held, so those are left in the traded position. The volumes are measured. The prices are public benchmarks, not this unit's trades. The product is derived, and is shown apart from the three measured lines above. 346 days to 12 September 2026, 33 of them still provisional in Elexon's settlement runs. Method and caveats
| Line | MWh or £ |
|---|---|
| Metered export, what crossed the meter out | 15,750 MWh |
| Metered import, what crossed the meter in | 17,854 MWh |
| Equivalent full cycles, everything sent out over one full charge | 394 over 346 days, 415 a year at that rate |
| Apparent meter to meter efficiency | 88%, an ordinary battery: round trip losses alone |
| Balancing offers accepted | 12,651 MWh |
| Balancing bids accepted | 11,808 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, export | 13,550 MWh |
| Position outside balancing, import | 16,497 MWh |
| Of which expected response delivery, net | −3,234 MWh 1,699 out, 4,933 in |
| Traded position, net | 288 MWh 13,736 out, 13,448 in |
| Traded position at the market index, sold | £1.4m |
| Traded position at the market index, bought | £993k |
| Traded position, net, at the index | £431k |
| Response delivery, net, at the imbalance price | −£302k −£284k at the index |
| Balancing and outside balancing together | £647k £34.13/kW/yr |
When it moved, against when power was dear
Across every half hour this unit was metered the market index averaged £93.43. What it sent out was worth £103.65 a megawatt hour at that same index, 1.11 times the average. What it took in was worth £73.85, 0.79 times. Selling above one and buying below one is a unit positioned into the dear half hours and out of the cheap ones. It measures the half hours it chose, not the price anyone paid it, which is not published.
What it paid to buy energy back
When NESO accepts a bid, this unit delivers less than it had already sold, or takes more in. It pays for the energy it no longer delivers, and that payment is most of what makes the balancing figure above negative. Whether that is a cost or a margin depends on the price it paid. Across 11,808 MWh of accepted bids it paid an average of £73.48 a megawatt hour. The market index averaged £96.38 across those same half hours, so it bought back at £22.90 a megawatt hour below the going price.
| Price it paid | Volume | Average | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|
| below zero | 563 MWh | −£17.56 | £10k received |
| £0 to £25 | 575 MWh | £11.84 | £7k |
| £25 to £50 | 845 MWh | £38.23 | £32k |
| £50 to £75 | 3,099 MWh | £65.06 | £202k |
| £75 to £100 | 4,801 MWh | £87.28 | £419k |
| above £100 | 1,925 MWh | £113.16 | £218k |
On 563 MWh the price was below zero: NESO paid this unit an average of £17.56 a megawatt hour to take energy, £10k in all. That is a constrained network with more generation on it than it can move.
The other direction, offers, is much smaller here: 12,651 MWh where NESO asked for more, paid at an average of £109.56 against an index of £81.34.
Physical checks passed: the meter never exceeded the registered power by more than fifteen per cent, and the year's exports against imports are what a battery does.
Where it stands
| Balancing incomewhole fleet, £/kW/yr | 92nd percentile98 units | |
| Balancing incomeEngland and Wales peer group | 88th percentile70 units | |
| Balancing income2.0 hour duration cohort | 88th percentile61 units | |
| Balancing incomebatteries sold by Tesla Motors Limited | 93rd percentile15 units | |
| All three measured lineswhole fleet, £/kW/yr | 87th percentile229 units | |
| Energy sent outhours at full power | 95th percentile96 units | |
| Energy taken inhours at full power | 84th percentile96 units |
Percentiles, so 90 means better than nine in ten of the cohort named beside it, on that measure alone, over the same 364 days. Rates are pounds per kilowatt per year, annualised over the days the unit has been on the system, the same figures the performance league ranks on. A high position in the taken-in table is not a fault: a constraint asset is paid to charge, and charging is its job.
The nearest comparables
The five nearest in size in England and Wales, and this battery among them, ranked by what each was paid for every kilowatt it holds over the 364 days to the same date. They run for about the same length of time. Same market, same rules, same weather.
| Battery | MW | Hours | Measured, per kW |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oldham BESS | 20 | 2h | £81.1/kW/yr |
| Newport BESS | 21 | 2h | £60.3/kW/yr |
| Carnegie Road 1 | 20 | 2h | £54.9/kW/yr |
| Farnham BESS | 20 | 2h | £45.5/kW/yr |
| Hawkers Hill Batterythis battery | 20 | 2h | £38.0/kW/yr |
| Feeder Road | 20 | 1.5h | £35.8/kW/yr |
See it on the map
Every figure on this page traces to a published file. If something here is wrong about your asset, the methods section says how to tell us.